CONSUMER PERCEPTION STUDY OF THE VALUE PROPOSITION

Authors

  • Eko Tjiptojuwono Business Administration, Politeknik NSC, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Hening Widi Oetomo Indonesia School of Economics (STIESIA), Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract

The service dominant logic theory has 10 premises. One of the important premises to analyze is the value proposition. There are 11 value proposition indicators proposed by Vargo and Lusch (2004), namely newness, performance, customization, getting the job done, design, brand or status, price, cost reduction, risk reduction, accessability, and convenience or usability. This study was conducted to determine the most dominant indicators have the appropriate value, especially in higher education. The research data was collected by random sampling method and obtained 82 respondents who are students of a university. The questionnaire was given using a Liket scale of 1-4. The data is then processed and presented in the form of tables and figures, then analyzed descriptively to find out which indicators get the best response. The results showed that the feedback and risk reduction indicators got the best response. And performance and design indicators get the lowest response. Thus, it can be concluded that feedback and risk reduction are very important factors seen by consumers on the value proposition, especially in the higher education service industry.

 

References
Buttle, F., 2009. Customer Relathionship Management Concepts and Technologies. Second Edition. Hungary: Butterworth Heinemann.
Frow, P., J. R. McColl-Kennedy, T. Hilton, A. Davidson, A. Payne, and D. Brozovic, 2014. Value Propositions. Marketing Theory 14(3), 327–351.
Hasan, A. 2012. The Value Proposition Concept in Marketing: How Customers Perceive the Value Delivered by Firms – A Study of Customer Perspectives on Supermarkets in Southampton in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Marketing Studies Vol. 4, No. 3; June 2012.
Kotler, P. and G. Armstrong, 2018. Principle of Marketing, 17th Edition. Pearson Education Limited. United Kingdom.
Kowalkowski, C. 2011. Dynamics of Value Propositions: Insights from Service-Dominant Logic. European Journal of Marketing (45), 1/2, 277-294.
Osterwalder, A and Y. Pigneur, 2014. Business Model Generation. Alih bahasa oleh Natalia Ruth Sihandrini. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Payne, A. and P. Frow, 2014. Developing Superior Value Propositions: A Strategic Marketing Imperative. Journal of Service Management 25(2), 213–227.
Skålen, P., J. Gummerus, C. Koskull, and P. Magnusson. 2015. Exploring Value Propositions and Service Innovation: a Service-Dominant Logic Study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43(2): 137-158.
Vargo, S.L and R.F. Lusch, 2015. The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing. Dialog, Debate, and Directions. Routledge Publisher. New York.

 

Downloads

Published

2022-03-24

How to Cite

Tjiptojuwono, E. ., & Oetomo, H. W. . (2022). CONSUMER PERCEPTION STUDY OF THE VALUE PROPOSITION . International Conference of Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 520–528. Retrieved from https://debian.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/icobuss1st/article/view/203