• Hary Wahyudi East Java Corpotare University Surabaya Indonesia


One need in developing an organization is the ability of a leader to create models of creative collaboration with various partners. Through creative collaboration, there are more alternatives and more effective actions. In addition, creative collaboration can solve problems, increase access, and quality in competency development. Collaboration in building creative networks can be realized if each stakeholder can create ideas and excellence in collaboration that is beneficial for each party. This shows that the Corpu approach has been accepted as part of a competency development policy, and needs to be implemented by all government agencies. Corpu in this case is interpreted as an ASN competency development approach that acts as a strategic tool to support the achievement of the organization's vision and mission through an integrated learning process involving experts from inside/outside government agencies. ASN Corpu structure does not need to be formed in an organizational structure, attached to the existing organizational structure. The tasks, functions and activities that exist in ASN Corpu can be added to the tasks and functions of the applicable structure.


Allen, M. 2007. THe Corporate University Handbook: Designing, Managing and Growing a Succesful Program. USA: Amacom.
Christensen, C.M. dan Bower, J. L. 1996. Customer Power, Strategic Investment and the Failure of Leading Firms. Strategic Management Journal. 17 (3) : 197-218.
Christensen, C.M. dan Overdorf, M. 2000. Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change. Harvard Business Review (78:1): 67–76.
Christensen, C.M. dan Raynor, M.E. 2003. Innovator’s Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
Christensen, C.M., Raynor, M.E., dan McDonald, R. 2015. What is Disruptive Innovation. Harvard Business Review. Desember 2015. https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation. 15 Maret 2018 (20:35)
Firdaus, A. 2017. The Implementation of Corporate University in Public Sector: Case Study Ministry of Finance of Indonesia. The Netherland.
Given, L.M. 2008. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications Inc. Thousand Oaks, California.
Gonzales, D. 2017. Understanding and Contextualizing Corporate University. Personal Development Series.
awler, E. E. 2008. Talent: Making People Your Competitive Advantage. San Francisco: JosseyBass
Lawrence, John Suprihanto. 2007. Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia. PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, Jakarta.
Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative Researching 2nd edition. Sage Publication Ltd. Thousand Oaks, California
McDonald, M. dan Rowsell-Jones, A. 2012. The Digital Edge: Exploiting Information & Technology for Business Advantage. Gartner Inc.
Meister, J. 1998. Corporate Universities: Lessons in Building a World-Class Work Force, Revised Edition 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill Education
MKI Corporate University. 2013. Corporate University: Berinvestasi di Ladang Emas. HC Journal 3(15): 15—31.
Moustakas, C. 1994. Phenomenological Research Methods. USA: SAGE Publications Inc.
Muduli, A. 2012. Business Strategy, SHRM, HR Outcome and Organizational Performance: Evidence from an Indian Industry. Global Management Journal 4(1/2): 111-125.
Myers MD. Qualitative Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 1997;21(2):241-242.
Neubauer, Brian E, Witkop and Varpio L. 2019. How Phenomenology Can Help Us Learn from The Experiences Of Others. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6468135/. Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr; 8(2): 90–97.
Ramelan. 2018. Corporate University Bukanlah Universitas. https://dev.ppm-manajemen.ac.id/blog/artikel-manajemen-18/post/corporate-university-bukanlah-universitas-1405. 3 Juni 2021 (20:00)
Rothwell, W. J. 2005. Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within (3rd ed.). New York: American Management Association
Rowley, J. 2002. Using Case Studies in Research. Management Research News. Volume 25 (1) :16-27.
Rowlinson, M., dan Procter, S. 1995. Organizational Culture and Business History. Organization Studies. 20(3): 369-396.
Silverman, D. 2000. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. Sage Publications Inc. Thousand Oaks, California
Simons, H. 2009. Case Study Research in Practice. Sage Publications Inc. Thousand Oaks, California.
Smith, David Woodruff, "Phenomenology", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/phenomenology/. 5 Juni 2021 (11:30)
Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research: Perspectives on Practice. Sage Publication Ltd. Thousand Oaks, California
Stewart, D. 2010. Growing the Corporate Culture. https://www.wachovia.com/foundation/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=ab411f07760aa110VgnVCM1000004b0d1872 RCRD&vgnextfmt=default. 9 Juli 2020 (17:15)
Strauss, A., dan Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd ed. Sage Publications Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA.
Telkom Indonesia. 2017. Accelerating the Indonesian Digital Economy. Annual Report 2017. Jakarta.
Vance, R.J. 2006. Employee Engagement and Commitment. SHRM Foundation.
Widyastika, Y. 2020. Kesiapan Lembaga Pelatihan Pemerintah Menjadi Corporate University (Studi Kasus di Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Sumber Daya Manusia Ketenagakerjaan). Jurnal Bina Ketenagakerjaan. 1:65—83
Yuliastanti, V.Y. 2019. Mengukur dan Menilai Kemujaraban Program-program Corporate University. https://bppk.kemenkeu.go.id/content/berita/sekretariat-badan-mengukur-dan-menilai-kemujaraban-programprogram-corporate-university-2019-11-05-fd80e6b0/. 25 September 2021 (11:11).
Yuniarto, Agung, Hubeis, dan Sukmawati. 2019. Faktor-Faktor Kunci Kesuksesan Implementasi Corporate University dalam Rangka Transformasi Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen dan Bisnis. Vol 5 no 3: 466—477.